infodimensions
The Web as Revolutionary
When Time magazine was rumored to make the Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg its Person of the Year, Ye 5th’s Editor thought that another Media “Academy Award” was a little too much. But with the revolt in Tunisia and the outbreak of dissent and protests in Egypt, both largely organized and propelled by social media including Facebook on the Web, maybe Facebook, social media and the Web deserve more attention and respect for what they have and are accomplishing. Two repressive and corrupt Arab regimes, first Tunisia and now Egypt are foundering. In the case of Tunisia, not just the dictator at the top; but all his cohorts are being brought down.Certainly one can understand why China has banned Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter and other Western news and social media from its “Internet airwaves”.
The NYTimes, having transformed itself from the brink of print publishing oblivion with sophisticated use of Web technology, has been following the protests in Arab countries with up-to-the minute Web enabled reportage and debate. Here is a summary of the latest assessment from Egypt:
What Egypt is witnessing today is a pro-change revolt that drew diverse elements of society into the streets. Regardless of their ideological orientations, they all seek to achieve clear demands: freedom of expression and association, and an end to corruption, poverty, unemployment and Mubarak’s three decade’s long reign.
The country’s young people have been instrumental in the uprising. They have created their own opposition movement: the April 6th Youth Movement, which is independent of the formal political structures or existing political parties. With more than 80,000 members on the Internet brought together through the extensive use of social media Web sites, the movement has organized a series of successful general strikes and rallies over the past three years. Action-oriented, the youth movement is the country’s hope in keeping the momentum for change going.
Will the Tunisian model repeat itself in Egypt? The answer is uncertain. Revolutions are not exportable, particularly considering the huge military and security force behind Mr. Mubarak’s regime, the weak and fragmented opposition parties, the fear of an Islamist takeover, the willingness of the regime to mount brutal force against the demonstrators and Egypt’s strategic weight with its Western allies.
When you read the accounts here and at the BBC there is no denying the key enabling role of the Web and the powerful messaging beacon of Aljezeera. What is not obvious is how events will play out in Egypt. Will the Mubarak regime attempt a Tienamen Square like crackdown and be successful. There is already interruption of Internet and cellphone services. But does the regime have the wherewithal to enforce widespread Internet restrictions as in China? Literally revolutions unfold … and it is on the Web … for now.
Self-Healing Web Makes It Invulnerable?
As compelling is the question of whether the Web’s vaunted self-repair capabilities can overcome a government or regime determined to bring its messaging and intercommunication powers down.China appears to be largely successful but with a long developed legal and technological apparatus. Certainly Egyptian authorities are working to suppress both cellphone and Internat communications. But the Egyptian methods are blunt – turn off the power. How long they can leave the power off is an open question given how much cellphones and the Internet are a part of social and more importantly economic life in Egypt. Events of the next few days and weeks will reveal how revolutionary the Power of the Web truly is.
Concept Maps | Idea Trails | Mind Mapping

Concept Map
More to come…
Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer on Censorship
The Guardian and Financial Times in England have been covering the China vs Google story much more closely than US media. So when the Guardian published a story about Bill Gates reactions to the conflict , curious, I took a look:
After pouring billions of dollars into the global fight against malaria and rebranding Microsoft in a more cuddly, human way, Bill Gates had just about shaken off accusations that he represented all that was unappealing about aggressive American capitalism.
But today his reinvention suffered something of a setback when he played down China’s attempts to stifle dissent on the internet as “very limited”.
Less than two weeks after Google said it planned to uncensor its Chinese search engine in protest at attempts to break into the email accounts of human rights activists, Gates criticised his rival’s decision and insisted that agreeing to Beijing’s demands was just part of doing business in the country. “You’ve got to decide: do you want to obey the laws of the countries you’re in or not? If not, you may not end up doing business there,” he told ABC’s Good Morning America programme.
He also brushed aside accusations that Microsoft has been complicit in helping filter the web by saying that it was not an issue because any censorship could be circumvented with technical knowledge. “Chinese efforts to censor the internet have been very limited,” he said. “It’s easy to go around it, so I think keeping the internet thriving there is very important.”
Gates’s comments echo those last week by Microsoft chief executive, Steve Ballmer, who took a swipe at Google by suggesting that the company had over-reacted in China. “People are always trying to break into other people’s data,” he said on Friday. “There’s always somebody trying to break into Microsoft.”
Ballmer also likened Microsoft’s complicity in actively filtering internet content to the oil industry’s decision to import oil from Saudi Arabia, despite the censorship that takes place there. “If the Chinese government gives us proper legal notice, we’ll take that piece of information out of the Bing search engine,” adding that even countries with “extreme” free speech laws, such as the US, exercised some censorship.
The comments of both men come despite the fact that efforts to censor the internet in China – a project known as the Golden Shield – are among the most extensive in the world. The country’s estimated 300 million internet users are almost all affected by the various blocks and filters, which include direct censorship of anti-government protesters, members of the Falun Gong religious group, Tibetan independence campaigners and the Taiwanese media. At various points, Beijing has also blocked access to international news websites including the BBC and the Guardian, and around 50 Chinese bloggers are in prison as a result of their postings.
If you are interested, the Guardian has one of the best coverages of the China vs Google and its broader implications – see more here.
Bing’s Advantage
The following NYTimes story shows the impact that Microsoft’s newly re-relaunched search engine, Bing, is having in the search engine wars. Instead of being a hapless me-too, Bing brings real innovation and a competitive advantage in search results display to BING over Google. But the writing was on the wall – Google’s frugal search result display under attack:

The screenshot above shows the CUIL browser’s display of search data and ASK.com also has shown this type of innovation where images are used and there is a sidebar of categories/tags associated with the search item “Warkworth Ontario”. But CUIL, the work of a Google alumnus, does not have a)the hovering previews of each site[rather there is a small thumbnail image plucked from each site] that is a key part of Bing’s feature set and b)CUIL does not have the $100M advertising budget that Microsoft has brought to bear for the weeks after Bing’s launch. So now Google finds itself in unfamiliar territory – at the bottom of the heap in the innovative display of search results. Worse for Google, Microsoft leads.
What will be more interesting to see is how quickly Google responds to Bing given that the underlying AJAX technology to add these these types of features are quite familiar to Google [see its Google Maps and Google Docs technologies]. Even more intriguing is the fact that Microsoft has said that the current release of Bing is only the first foray – and that Bing would be offering even more search display features in the future. So what goodies does Redmond have up it sleeves?
Memo to antitrust regulators – note that the dominant and monopolistic player, Google, did nothing to improve displaying search results despite several small start-ups innovations until a player [Microsoft] who could do some damage to Google’s market share introduced a browser with such capabilities. Proof yet again that the pace of innovation declines in markets where monopolies are allowed to persist.
“Most IT pros not planning on Windows 7 rollout”
“Most IT pros not planning on Windows 7 rollout” is the headline of an article at the IT scoop site, theRegister. The story is based on a survey done of 1100 business users by Scriptlogix. This survey goes counter to what Microsoft has been saying about users reactions to Windows 7.
A number of factors are cited for the rejection of Windows 7:
1)Time to test and rollout the OS;
2)formidable learning curve for existing users particularly with revamped Office 2010;
3)1/3 of firms do not have staff because they have cut staff or delayed hires;
4)the step from Windows XP to Windows 7 is perceived as being even more daunting.
Bottomline is that the survey found that 60% of surveyed users have no plans whatsoever to upgrade to Windows 7. The Register notes:
“ScriptLogic’s findings will jolt Microsoft who’s already deemed Windows 7 a success, at least in hitting the development milestones. The data also runs counter to an apparently emerging industry wisdom that Microsoft’s next client will be a relative shoo-in compared to Windows Vista, because it offers significantly improved performance – and because nothing could ever be as bad as Windows Vista.“
This analysis does not take into account that a)Windows Vista is not faster than Windows XP and b)will be faced with odious comparison for speed/performance with Apple’s Snow Leopard and Google’s Android and Chrome OS. One begins to wonder if Microsoft is getting to be a fumble-butt in the OS game.